Substantial Doubt 가 있을때, 어떤 Opinion이 적절할까?
■The types of opinion
Exceptions | Types of Audit Opinion | ||
Immaterial | Material | Material and Pervasive | |
Scope Limitation | Unmodified | Qualified | Disclaimer |
Departure from GAAP |
Unmodified | Qualified | Adverse |
■ A Substantial Doubt
-Unmodified Opinion is O.K.
By itself, this doubt does not require a modification of the opinion.
즉, By itself, a substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern does not require a modification of the opinion paragraph.
■ E-o-m에 꼭 담아야 하는 것
If an auditor determines that there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue operations for a reasonable period, the auditor should include an emphasis-of-matter paragraph in the audit report describing the going-concern issue.
This paragraph should include the terms “substantial doubt” and “going concern”.
○ The auditor does not have discretion regarding inclusion of the paragraph.
↔■ E-o-m 에 담는 것이 선택(may consider)인 경우
Examples of circumstances when the auditor may consider an emphasis-of-matter paragraph to be necessary include
(1) an uncertainty relating to the outcome of unusually important litigation or regulatory action,
(2) a major catastrophe that has had (or continues to have) a significant effect on the entity’s financial position,
(3) significant transactions with related parties, and
(4) unusually important subsequent events.
참고:
https://efforty.tistory.com/13
문단 순서: Basis → Opinion → e-o-m → o-m
Basis ■ 위치: A basis for modification paragraph should precede the opinion paragraph. ※ No Basis ■ If the auditor has contained Unmodified opinion in the report, ○ No basis is given for includ..
efforty.tistory.com
※ 주의?! However, if the entity’s disclosures about the issue are inadequate, the misstatement may result in a qualified or an adverse opinion.
- Disclaimer of Opinion is O.K.
However, an auditor may disclaim an opinion in these circumstances.
- Qualified Opinion is Not allowed.
Thus, a qualified opinion is inappropriate.
However, if the entity’s disclosures about the issue are inadequate, the misstatement may result in a qualified or an adverse opinion.